Reincarnation in the Bible

Council Lecture from Medium Divaldo Franco

Imperator City, Rio de Janeiro Brazil. Date: 19.08.1988

If you wish to know more about the Medium, please take a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divaldo_Pereira_Franco

Date of the Lecture: 19.08.1988

Date of Publication via Youtube: 21.08.2013 

Youtube: https://youtu.be/CxDa3XIg5Fs

Pray: “Jesus, unconditional friend, bless us”

Divaldo: The adorable Professor Charles Richet, considered the father of human physiology, also one of the fathers of human Metapsychics, asserted with depth, a epoch something is implausible, in another era is credible, referring the thesis of Metapsychics. At that time, the contemporary thinking refused any possibility of a transpersonal reality.

The physiology and psychology advocated anyone that death was the end of life . The moment was given to brain death, the deoxygenation of Neurons, the creature ceased to exist and of course the soul, who was perspiration cerebral, no longer has legitimacy.

The concept of Richet is to draw Attention to new ideas, since that new ideas are always fought with wickedness.

And in the same epoch, the notable and pessimistic German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche said:  Any new idea in the beginning is fought, then ridiculed and finally comes to become a reality fully accepted. So it’s been through along the history of revolutionary ideas.

This topic is to refer to an exceptional man which presents a thesis in which he has been denied vehementlyexperiencing sarcasm and mockery and which gives into consideration, the human creature incorporates to their daily lives. I wish to refer to the Indian parapsychologist Hemendra Nath Banerjee and the theory of reincarnation.

Coming from  the city of Jaipur in India, the psychologist concentrated his work at the observation of exceptional children. Those who were provided with the genius and others that seemed to have a not necessarily brain Memory.

Brain memory is the one that comes in the DNA code and accompanying the development of the rational, through the various periods of their formation organic.

Banerjee had found children who were able to give informations that were not acquired in the current existence. And therefore he created psychological concept of extra brain Memory.

He had the occasion to say that reincarnation is a thesis that surprises the Western mind. And when it comes to any means to about reincarnation, people not clarified, invariably assume any of four positions:

The first is the classic negation, pure and simple. Very comfortable and commodious attitude. The second is a posture of reaction, based on religious doctrines that the individual professes.  The third is the attitude of acceptance and the fourth is a scientific Approach.

He said that it was very comfortable deny. For denying, enough 2 words: I do not believe.

It had been refused for many centuries the reality of the heliocentric System. And notwithstanding, the Earth has ever been fixed.

Tried to negate the story through the law of universal Gravitation: When heavier the body, the less his fall. And yet, this is the law that rules the cosmos, sustaining the galactic balance.

So, those who deny the reincarnation without ever been concerned with any analysis, keep an attitude of convenience, an anti-scientific attitude.  These people do not deserve further  cultural consideration.

The second group consists of those who say:I do not believe in reincarnation, because the religion I profess denies the reincarnation.  For me, it does not have any Basis”

And we heard this assertive (statement), through persons linked to different ramifications to Christianity, as  Coptic Christianity Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Roman Catholic Apostolic, Protestant, asserting that  his  Religion  denies the reincarnation.

These people deserve human respect, however demonstrates that they do not know their Religion.

If we make an analysis about the historical reality of the Religions, we will verify that the generating of Christianity, the reincarnation doctrine is professed by Jesus and accepted by his disciples. Several times we find Jesus referring to reincarnation, notwithstanding, using another word as it is obvious. The word that translates reincarnation is of Greek nature, Palingenesia, doctrine of several births, the Genesis.

In Torah, the word reincarnation is in the vocable (sorry, I didn´t understand the vocabulary, but it sounds like guilagu), that means born again. The Hebrew Torah accepts reincarnation, which was part of the secret indoctrination of the primitive doctrine.

Jesus refered several times to reincarnation. All of us, Christians, we have read the gospel, remember us  for  a instance of  the Moment he arriving at the place, he met a man who was blind since birth.  And the disciples interrogate him”why he was born blind. On account of own mistakes or from his parents?

What does this mean the passage? They believed in reincarnation. Therefore, that that man had sinned before being born, of course that was in a previous existence.

And as he was not carrying any negative karmic manifestation, Jesus redargue: neither he nor his parents sinned, but is in order to fulfill God’s will, that is, so that I can break free from blindness, since he did not have any negative commitment by law.

Later we will have the opportunity to magistral  Dialog to hear Jesus asked his disciples, Whom do men say that the Son of Man is?

And they elucidate: “Some say that you are Elias, others say Jeremiah, while others say that thou art John the Baptist and others who says you are the prophet who returned”

Then he asks Simon Peter: And you who say that I am? And Peter, taken from a psychic emotion, replied: “I say that thou art the Son of God, the Messiah we expected“.

And Jesus concludes Simao: “It was not flesh and blood have revealed you. It was my father who is in the heavens who revealed to you”

Let´s analyze: The people said that Jesus was Elijah, Jeremiah, John the Baptist or one of the prophets that alread were dead. Of course they thought that Jesus had been reincarnated.

But as he was not Elijah or Jeremiah, let alone Joao Batista, who desencarnava was little, and was not also none of the prophets, because Jesus was not reincarnated.
It is the sublime governor Earth, who became incarnate in order to serve as model and guide, leading us to God.

He asks Simao: Who do you say?
And Simao, who was medium, receives influx of divine Inspiration and reproof, Thou art the Messiah, the one we expected.

But if this is not enough, later, are the disciples who inquire: “Rabbi, it is not necessary to come before the Messiah comes Elijah?” And he clarifies: “But the Elijah who was to come, has already come. This, that is there, (they all understood he was talking about John the Baptist).

How could John the Baptist be Elias, if Elias had died nearly 800 years before? Only through reincarnation.

If we see the prophetic sermon, Mark 13, you will have the opportunity to draw the events of the end of the negative moral times. And in the final stage, he says: Do not pass this generation without all that I say, be fulfilled until the last Jota (a tiny Greek letter).

But we can see that it all about he said, did not happen.

Then he made a mistake or we misinterpret the Phrase. Will not pass this generation … From bodies or Spirits?

We will not be in humankind certain remnants of that spiritual generation. which has been reincarnated and that we are still here on Earth, waiting for the final Moment?

However, it’s wonderful the dialogue with Nicodemus, when the celebrated doctor of law who sat on the judgment seat of the Sanhedrin, one of 70 doctors of the law, keep an interview with Jesus and the gospel narrates the answer, the same as saying that there has been question: Verily, I say to you, it is necessary to be born again to enter the kingdom of heaven.

And the man who knew the Torah, the Mosaic Pentateuch, taken by surprise, requires: Lord, how is possible an old man enter the womb of his mother to be Born again?” He understood the answer. And Jesus makes clear: it is necessary born of water and of the Spirit to enter the kingdom of heaven.

The spirit blows where it wills, is like the wind, do not know where it comes from or where it goes. That which is born of the flesh is flesh. That which is born of the spirit is Spirit.

Later, the doctrines that descended from Christianity to Go to say that this revival is given through baptism, when the person is separated from the original sin. For those who are not informed,  of the sin of disobedience committed by Eve, who then seduced Adam. It is necessary that the person separates this grave sin, which led the two creatures to cohabit and entering the sensuality, they populated the earth. This is the explanation of orthodox religions.  Religions that much we respect, though we do not agree with their Explanation.

Let us analyze: If it is necessary to baptize, and those who die without the minimal possibility to receive the baptism like Eskimos, primitive people of New Guinea, creatures lost in the forests or in the cities children whose parents deny baptism and not grant them the purification. To where they go?  To limbo, a place of eternal indifference. But is it fair to punish a person who does not have any responsibility for not having been baptized? The answer is extravagant, exotic.

And those who were born before Jesus? Mankind had almost 4,000 years of ethical culture in civilization. Well, those Jesus redeemed with his blood, which does not let to be very comfortable.

Cambyses king of the Persians, Julio Cesar, Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus had one unimaginable cruelty , who were evil, which destroyed civilizations, which ruined cities, Jesus has redeemed them.

And we, only because we were born later, we have to strive for own redemptionIt is a placement of logic, anti-Logical. Because it would be ideal that Jesus was coming first and taught to all and the disobedient ones would suffer but not dividing society: Those who were  born before, they are saved by the blood. And those who came later,  the bastards who is to be cleansed, making the doctrine of Christ one swing of nonsense.

But let us examine if there was original sin:

Says the Bible, and the Bible with all due respect, is a book of contradictions, starting of the so called creation, when God said on the first day: It makes the Light, and there was light. And this was the first day.

On the second day, God separated the land from the waters. And this was the second day.

On the third day, he created the stars. And there is a basic error. How can there be light, if there were no stars to Project it? How could there be clarity, if there was no sun? How could there be clarity in the chaos, if there were no stars?

The science uprising to protest and asserts that 15 billion years ago, two particles were stirred into chaos, was cloned as one another, absolutely the same nuclear charge carrier. Until an additional particle emerged and caused the Big Bang. Starting from there it espandem universal particles, which continue to expand in our universe, Law of Einstein. But if we look at the Bible, we find that the creation refers only Earth, which is an insignificant planet. It is a planet devoid of any astronomical value.

The extraordinary English astrophysicist Sir James Jeans, to give an idea to us, that we are not masters in astronomy, he says for example: So we have a dimension, if we consider our Milky Way galaxy, just our galaxy, with the dimension that comes from extreme northern of north america till the southern end of South america, the solar system would be the size of a dime of Dollar and the Earth would have the dimension of the tip of a pin and the sun would have the volume of the pin head. So we have idea of the Earth’s nothing significant if we analyze us that our galaxy is poor. She has only 200 billion suns. There are approximately 100 million galaxies bigger than ours. And the Hubble telescope is photographing daily galaxies that appear and others who succumb to black holes

But we take the Bible literally: God, on the seventh day, when his work is finished, he took a cake mud and modeled the being, He breathed into his life, giving this being the name of Adam, made of sludge, created from clay. And after meditating, God realized, literal words, which was not good for the man to be alone. Made him fall asleep, he took out a rib and made the woman.

We will enter now in the absurd area. Why it would have to be a rib? For the woman was perpetually dependent upon man. It’s a chauvinistic vision of the Jewish doctrine. God is man. The first being  is to be a man, a woman is a piece of the man, that should pay obedience.

And I wonder if it was not good for man to live alone? Why did it not another being men of clay, breathed into him life and gave him a Partner? Why he gave a female companion?

So, God says to them: “Here is the paradise”, which was in a Region next of Mesopotamia. “Here’s everything you want, but you can not approach or penetrate the tree of wisdom of good and evil. ”

The light of psychology was a classic mistake of God, because all that is forbidden is gonna be desired. And that God is omniscient , he should already know what was about to to happen after.  Otherwise he is not  omniscient, one of God attributes, the capacity to know everything that there is to know, past, present and future.

Starting from that moment the paradise is now the tree. If he had not said anything, they never would come next to the tree. because it was a enormous paradise. Then the devil,took the form of a Serpent, female. The lords notice how say the German psychoanalyst Dr. Hanna Wolf, the tragedy male chauvinism. Comes the serpent seduced Eve, it was weak. And Eve seduced, seduces Adam, who was not weak, but he has been enticed and then they disobeyed God…  We note that this is a myth. is a legend that deserves any affection of a historical legend …
… So, at this point they realized that they were naked…psychologically, they discovered the sensuality, because the were naked…

And of course they covered the prudish parts and God appeared angered… It can not be God. The supreme mercy, the supreme wisdom. Angry with those two children? It’s like we get angry with our children just for being bearer of ignorance, and instead of guiding,  we complained, we punish, and he became repressed.

then, Godin desperation punishes them… And how? “Today From you shall eat the bread by the sweat of your face”, making work a disgrace, transformed work into a punishment.

When Jesus told us, “my father until now works, and I also work“, because the work is psychotherapy. Let’s look at the retired who forcibly stop working, and of course makes the neurotic disorder of worthlessness, begin to consider themselves as marginalized People. And ours is a country of marginalized, because we believe that we already lived. We are already retired. The retired person has a disgrace timbre. And People talk like that, “he is retired, we are doing a favor for which he lives“.

Then, we’ll look at how the situation does not correspond to reality: “They were expelled and God punished the snake, forcing her to crawl…” It is another absurd. Incidentally, the snake walked on the tip of the tail? This to show the inconsistency. It is an analysis of psychological logic, it is not an analysis of ordinary criticism. It’s an Analysis..

Then they left the paradise, cohabiting and had their first child, a man. They had a second son, a man:  Cain and Abel.

Cain was bad, it was envy, was stingy. Abel was good, noble, was gentle.

We saw that this is a mythology that psychoanalysis interprets very well: It is the dark side and the light side of the creature, the duality of good and evil. They are not two people, as some try to apply us.

And God liked Abel, which is a negative father. He should like more  Cain. For who deserves love is the ill Person, not the healthyAbel did what pleased God, but the donation of Cain displeased him. So Cain was overcome with rage and killed his brother. I would have done the same Thing. Being despised by God, when I tried to please him? An while  he honor my brother, who was already beloved? This is a cruel prejudice! When we see in all social areas protection to the sick, the frail, the minority, the rejected, but our biblical God is an arbitrary being.

And when Cain killed, God appears and asks, “Where is your brother?” And found the crime, he expelled him. And he goes to other lands, where he married With whom? There were only five: father, mother and two brothers. Or rather,  four. With whom he got married? But our Protestant brothers would say: “For God nothing is impossible”. Go to it: For God nothing is impossible. Let´s say he got married.

And God took pity on Eve and replace your murdered child by another good one:  Seth. And they populated the earth…. With whom? There was only one woman, who was the own mother. I do not know if you already thought of that? I‘m trying to understand. Let us think together? With whom? If you discover, let me know.

“They populated the earth. And when the earth was populated, there was the predominance of evil and God repented that he had created man“. So it’s not perfect. He did not know what to do. Like us, the psychology tells us not to repent, taking a attitude of responsibility, nothing morbid regrets or self-blame. Releases of guilt and responsibility of the acts.

“He pronounces the flood”, but there was on earth one family that was fair: Noe, his wife and three children. Men: Shem, Ham and Japheth.

God comes to them and said:” I’ll send the flood. but I want to save you  and your Family. Build an ark and preserve into it a couple of each animal, that the land be repopulated again

Noah begins to build with three children the ark, which will never float, because it is an anti-nautical vessel because he did not knew nothing about marine engineering. But let’s say that God helped. He built and put a couple of animals of the whole earth. Those of  middle Brazi crocodiles, Jaguars from the Amazon, the polar bear, penguins They were all there. And Noah was placed in the ark, well organized   The lords see that it’s a children’s Story, even  ridiculous. And then he closed up the ark and caulking. And it rained for forty days and forty nights. The Ark floated and the waters flooded the earth… other nonsense. There has never been geologically a complete flood. There was always partial floods. Recently there was a wave of 30 meters in Indonesia and  several villages were damaged, because of a marine earthquake. China is still submerged in the waters of the river vyang ze Yang. We can say that there was a local flood. And 40 days of rains are not enough to flood even certain regions, so unless the entire terrestrial globe.

Noah sent out a dove, which did not returned. Three days later he sent another, which returned back, bringing in his beak a olive branch. other nonsense. Or there was the flood that put an end to all or,  some olive trees have been saved. Let’s pretend it is.

Noe opened the ark, sent the animals out, they were obeyed and went to the tropical climate, to the glacial weather to reproduce. Noah left the ark, with his three male children, and repopulated the land with whom?

The mother was the only woman, and she was already elderly. Because the children were adults.  At first I even accept the absurd. But twice is too much. But we se, it is a methodological proposal.

When we saw the history of Rome, Romulus and Remus fed by a wolf. And it’s one of the most fascinating psychological Image. When we see the story here in Brazil, which tells about the river Solimoes, designed by our Indians, which has the same characteristic of biblical history: Tupé ordered that the lands were devastated by the waters and Ceiciperi were fortunate enough to be warned. They climbed on a tree that was dragged. And when the waters went down, the river Solimoes was Born. And they nurtured of fruits, from the shadows, and protection of own tree 

This mythology is present in all villages of the planet, as what Carl Gustav Jung calls: The archetype from archetype of the  divinity. The process of evolution of our thinking, from primitive to lucid, rational  thinking from today, then we’ll see that there was not actually any sin because the carnal communion is not sinful. It is a physiological function for the reproduction of being. The imbalance is not sex.It is at the head of the wearer. The perversion is mental, it is moral, is not biological. Sex is similar to the stomach. With specific purpose, such as liver that secretes a substance, which secretes bile and certain hormones that reciprocally fertilizing, give rise to life.

It is the old prejudice of the atavism of individual imbalance, which he intends to self castrate, self punishment, the concept of sin. Then we move to the doctrines of psychological liberation, full of health,  in which there is no sin, and the positive experience, the negative experience. So do not be justified baptism. Born of water, it is taking a new Body .It is the embryogeny that explains us. Animal fertilization, specifically the human, is the  watery fertilization. When the sperm travels through the fallopian tube. It is a straw that will engage the ovule, another drop of gelatinous water. At the time that the ovule receives the sperm, which loses its tail, and defends itself the invasion of others, we have a drop of water with a quantum of energy. This drop of water goes up to fallopian tube, engages in the womb and begins to nurture amniotic  liquid, Water. The creature develops in adulthood has on the body 68 per cent of water, minerals and other substances that consolidate the matter. And born of water is composed of new physiological Body.

Then Jesus said, “It is necessary to be born again.” Here is evidenced the reincarnation.

And if we advance in the history of Christianity, we see that the Christians were reincarnationists.

Some Protestant brothers are saying that the Apostle Paul proclaimed that life is unique and then came the judgmentThen they  come back to us triumphant and ask, “What about reincarnation?”

But we never said that life is multiple. Life is unique. The physical existences are several.  The creature enters the body and out of the body without entering even get out of life, like we change clothes without being changing body.

When the apostle Paul said that after death comes judgment, of course it happens. When the person Divaldo Franco disembodied, will come the judgment of the acts of Divaldo Franco character.

The spirit who has lived  as Divaldo experiences will have to give evidence and shall elect recovery a new stage (Karma), but no longer as Divaldo. The spirit is the same with the nomenclature another personality.

To make it easier understanding, the personalities are multiple. Individuality is eternal, the spirit is unique. I’m not Divaldo Franco. I’m being temporary Divaldo Franco. I was being John, Anthony, Daisy or whoever. But I am the sum of  experiences as immortal Spirit.

The child enters from the culture, going to a maternal school. After the day care, then to School… The child is the same, but the formation of personalities are diverse… The elementary school, high school, university, MBA, doctorate, master’s degree. It is the same being in different stages of the evolution process.

Then, when they claim that comes judgment because it ends the life which is unique, they are giving one interpretation that does not correspond the truth. Because spiritism does not say several lives, but many physical existence.

 Later these disciples of Jesus created a neo-Platonic school of Alexandria. Plato was reincarnationist.
Socrates was reincarnationist. The neo-Platonic school gave us Origenes, who created the doctrine of principles, the basic doctrine of the church, which was convicted in 553. Tertullian, the author of apologetics. Pocleos, Jambricos,  Eusebio, Agostinho, and a whole elite of reincarnationists  thinkers.

In the year 553, the Roman Empire was divided into two wings: What had by capital, Rome in the West and who was the Byzantine capital Constantinople in the East.

Ruled over the empire of the East Justinian, who had been married to an admirable woman, but she had had a very frivolous and erratic life. Theodora had left a brothel. According to history, he married her and she was the empress who administered the empire. She managed to create a number of Problems to the Vatican. It is sufficient to read about her life to know about that.

She died in the year 548 and had asked her husband, at the first opportunity, to become heretical the doctrine of reincarnation. Because she did not wanted to return to rescue the errors she committed in the past. She had so much horror to her own  past which, according to history, she ordered the killing of 500 prostitutes, her fellow profession, not to have any inheritance.

And the husband who was in love with her in the year 547, imposes the pope Virgilio, who transferred to Constantinople, under penalty  to create the schism. The pope, to accommodate the situation, came and the emperor demanded to be done the second ecumenic council of Constantinopel. which was do not universal. The pope opposes, wished it was Rome. The emperor with weapons, threatened. And this council started in 52 and was up 58.

In the year 553, the theory of reincarnation was put on Trial. And as he was a very democratic emperor, he said: “Those who voted against, I will pass by the sword” and won 3-2.

The reincarnation was considered a heretical doctrine. Since then she was rejected. The Catholic,  Apostolic, Roman church not deny the reincarnation.

And I will thank any Catholic, that brings me an ecclesiastical document of a council, in which reincarnation is considered heresy except the year 553, that do not have value, because it was not of universal character.

here you can read the whole Ecumenic Council.  Document in German language: Council

Immediately, he began to pursue reincarnationists and, according to history, he killed more than one million at that time. The church was used to continue decimating reincarnationists and came to cuminar last century, when finished killing the Cathars who lived in France and some in Spain.

So, the reincarnation is a Christian fact. When a person says that she  does not believe in it, because of her Religion, she demonstrates that does not know the history of her own Religion. 

Advertisements